![]() 09/17/2016 at 17:40 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Also this
![]() 09/17/2016 at 17:46 |
|
WHERE? WHERE!
![]() 09/17/2016 at 18:01 |
|
I liked the Frist, but enjoyed the Lane more
![]() 09/17/2016 at 18:06 |
|
I’ve been putting off going to the Frist for this one. Not sure why. I really enjoy the art deco cars they had a while back.
![]() 09/17/2016 at 18:10 |
|
I went to both, hard to choose a favorite, both very different
![]() 09/17/2016 at 18:10 |
|
First museum, Nashville
![]() 09/17/2016 at 18:11 |
|
I’m just not an art car person I guess.
![]() 09/17/2016 at 18:18 |
|
That drawing is a car wishing it was something else
![]() 09/17/2016 at 18:19 |
|
I'd still hang it up
![]() 09/17/2016 at 18:24 |
|
Possibly, they just seemed to be at different ends of the spectrum.
![]() 09/17/2016 at 18:44 |
|
Well, both the Matra MS670 (1972 Le Mans winner) and the Espace (I think that one is a second series) were designed and built by Matra.
Although the original idea of the Espace was in fact Chrysler Europe’s; for instance, the first prototypes even used the headlights of the Simca-Chrysler 1307/8/9, and the first generation Espaces built for Renault kept headlights with more or less the same rake (although, I suppose, a different supplier!).
When Peugeot –who have always been extremely conservative– bought Chrysler-Europe/Simca they did not like the project and it ended up in the hands of Renault.
Talk about shooting themselves in the foot.
![]() 09/20/2016 at 11:39 |
|
*“I think I can” intensifies*